Bangladesh H&M victory!! 24 hrs to get Gap

We’ve got em on the run – after our campaign caused a media storm in H&M’s home country Sweden, they’ve signed the Bangladesh worker safety agreement!!!

But GAP’s digging in their heels. If they don’t sign, many US companies could follow suit. Their shareholder meeting is in 24 hoursand the pressure’s building – let’s take this right to CEO Glenn Murphy’s door with phone calls, a massive petition delivery and ads in his hometown!

www.avaaz.org/en/gap_enough_fashion_victims/?bv24973 

Here is the original email

Dear friends, 

Hundreds of Bangladeshi women have been burned or crushed to death while making *our* clothes! In days, major fashion companies could sign an agreement that will either be a strong safety code or a weak PR ploy. If 1 million of us get the CEOs of GAP and H&M to back a life-saving code, the rest will follow:   

Sign the petition

We’ve all seen the horrific images of hundreds of innocent women burned or crushed to death in factories while making our clothes. In the next few days we can get companies to stop it happening again.

Big fashion brands source from hundreds of factories in Bangladesh. Two brands, including Calvin Klein, have signed a very strong building and fire safety pact. Others, led by Wal-Mart, have been trying to wriggle out of signing by creating a weak alternative that was pure PR. But the latest disaster has triggered crisis meetings and massive pressure to sign the strong version that can save lives.

Negotiations end in days. GAP and H&M are most likely to flip first to support a strong agreement, and the best way to press them is to go after their CEOs. If one million of us appeal directly to them in a petition, Facebook pages, tweets, and ads, their friends and families will all hear about it. They’ll know that their own and their companies’ reputations are on the line. People are being forced to make *our* clothing in outrageously dangerous buildings – sign on to make them safe, and forward this email widely:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/gap_enough_fashion_victims_global/?blABHeb&v=24973

The recent tragic collapse fits a pattern. In the last few years, fires and other disasters have claimed a thousand lives and left many others too injured to work. Bangladesh’s government turns a blind eye to dismal conditions, allowing suppliers to cut costs to make clothes at a pace and price that global fashion giants expect. The big brands say they check up, but workers saythe companies’ own audits can’t be trusted.

The worker-backed safety agreement calls for independent inspections, public reports about supplier factory conditions, and mandatory repairs. It’s even enforceable in courts of the companies’ home countries! Full details of which companies were buying from the factory that collapsed weeks ago aren’t yet known, and there’s no evidence GAP or H&M did so. But workers have died in other GAP and H&M supplier factories in Bangladesh and getting them onboard now would put tremendous pressure on other companies to follow.

The companies are making up their minds right now. Let’s call on the CEOs of GAP and H&M to lead the industry by signing the safety plan. Sign your name then share this email widely — once we reach 1 million we’ll take out ads that they can’t miss:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/gap_enough_fashion_victims_global/?blABHeb&v=24973

Time and time again, Avaaz members have come together to fight corporate greed and support human rights. Last year, we helped 100 Indian workers safely return home when a Bahraini corporation refused to let them leave. Let’s now take a stand to stop the deadly race to the bottom in factory safety.

With hope and determination, 

Jamie, Jeremy, Alice, Alex, Laura, Bissan, Ricken, Richard and the rest of the Avaaz Team 

Categories: Uncategorized

Personalized Web Experiences Prove Vital for Future Success

By Anna Papachristos | Published 05/02/2013 in 1to1 Magazine

PrintCommentShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
The Internet has become an integral part of the average consumer’s day-to-day life. Whether it’s used for business or pleasure, nearly everyone uses the Web to interact with friends, family, colleagues, and their favorite brands. But, while we connect with others on a personal level, many brands have yet to master and implement effective personalized online experiences.

According to Econsultancy‘s recent “The Realities of Online Personalization” report, most marketers see Web personalization as a vital component for business success, but many fail to comprehend the processes behind integrating these engagement tools. The survey, conducted in association with Monetate, polled 1,107 digital and e-commerce professionals working for brands and agencies to explore how they perceive personalization and its impact on the digital customer experience. The study examines the top issues behind personalization, the tactics and types of data being used to shape online customer experiences, and the obstacles standing in the way of success.

The following statistics explore how companies currently view online personalization and how they are handling this increased need to engage on an individualized level:
  • Ninety-four percent of respondents believe that personalizing their Web experience is critical to current and future success. Those companies that have personalized their Web experience have measured an average 19 percent boost in sales.
  • Sixty-six percent of all client-side respondents cited improved business performance and customer experience as the main drivers behind personalization.
  • While the majority of respondents recognize the benefits of personalization, 56 percent haven’t personalized their Web experiences because many (72 percent) don’t know where to start.
  • When adopting or improving personalization, IT roadblocks (47 percent) and legacy technology (46 percent) present the biggest obstacles overall, with 32 percent of companies citing this lack of technology as the primary barrier against real-time personalized experiences.
  • For client-side respondents, lack of budget and lack of staff act as primary barriers (44 percent). For supply-side respondents, lack of knowledge (54 percent) and the inability to translate data into action (51 percent) are the main obstacles.
  • Though 43 percent of those polled currently deliver personalized desktop experiences, with 40 percent planning to implement such experiences in the next 12 months, few in-house marketers offer personalized experiences via tablets (14 percent) and mobile phones (13 percent).

Key takeaway: Though the Web has made an indelible mark on how companies do business, online strategies continue to leave marketers perplexed as technology rapidly evolves. Data has grown increasingly abundant, but companies still have yet to effectively manage and employ all the information that floods in. Most marketers understand that this data offers numerous opportunities for cultivating strong relationships, but personalized Web experiences remain elusive for many. Companies must look beyond the mere act of data collection by analyzing consumer information in ways that allow both parties to engage with each other swiftly and effectively. By doing so, companies will be able to establish constant connectivity with their client base, while also determining an effective method for continued reevaluation and improvement in the personalized experience space.

Categories: Uncategorized

Once an enigma, the digital luxury market has hit its stride

WWD DIGITAL FORUM SPRING SESSION JUNE 12 LOS ANGELES
Speaker Spotlight: Jennifer Sidary
Once an enigma, the digital luxury market has hit its stride, growing into a viable retail channel. Couture Connoisseur Jennifer Sidary of the Zappos Couture Brand, Zappos Merchandising, Inc. is one of the people leading the digital luxury revolution. In addition to optimizing the user experience across platforms through responsive design and offering celebrity-driven content on site, she is also exploring innovative ways to bring the excitement of digital into the physical world.

What new opportunities are right for your brand—and what is next? Find out through valuable insight from Jennifer Sidary and others at the WWD Digital Forum Spring Session in Los Angeles on June 12.

Additional speakers to date:

  • Diego Berdakin, President & Co-Founder, BeachMint
  • Josh Berman, CEO & Co-Founder, BeachMint
  • Steve Yankovich, Vice President, Innovation & New Ventures, eBay Inc.
  • Elton X. Graham, Vice President, E-Commerce, Kellwood
  • Chris Murphy, Director, Brand Communications & Digital Marketing, adidas US
  • Dan Obegi, CEO, DermStore Beauty Group
  • Rachel Tipograph, Global Director, Digital & Social Media, Gap Inc.
  • And more…

Request your invitation today. For more information on attendance and sponsorship opportunities, visit wwd.com/ladigital or contact patricia_reidy@fairchildfashion.com212.630.5926.

Categories: Uncategorized

Deadly Collapse in Cambodia Renews Apparel Factory Safety Concerns

New York Times

May 17, 2013

TREAM TBAL, Cambodia — Survivors described a scene of panic Thursday after a raised storage area collapsed at a footwear factory in this Cambodian village, killing at least two workers, injuring a dozen more and underlining global worries about factory safety in poor countries.

 

Rescuers searched for survivors at a sneaker factory in a village southwest of the capital of Cambodia on Thursday.

Thomas Cristofoletti for The New York Times

The soles of shoes that were being produced at the factory.

“I don’t remember anything at all,” said Hey Sokheng, a 19-year-old factory worker who looked dazed in her hospital bed in Phnom Penh, the capital. “When I woke up, I was being dragged out of the rubble by someone.”

Multinational clothing retailers have been considering Cambodia as one of several countries that could be alternatives to Bangladesh for manufacturing after the disaster three weeks ago at a garment factory complex there that killed at least 1,127 people. The collapse and the grueling search for survivors prompted an international outcry for retailers to assume more responsibility for the safety of workers at their suppliers.

The accident at the sneaker factory in Tream Tbal, which is about an hour’s drive southwest of Phnom Penh, is a reminder that workplace accidents and shoddy construction are not confined to Bangladesh, worker advocates say.May 17, 2013

“The shoe and garment industry is built upon huge profits and little concern for the well-being of their workers,” said Tessel Pauli, a spokeswoman for the Clean Clothes Campaign, an anti-sweatshop group based in Amsterdam. “It is inherently unsafe and dangerous to work in. As long as workers are marginalized and deprived of their basic rights, the situation will not improve.”

A report by Better Factories Cambodia, a program of the International Labor Organization, highlighted concerns about workplace safety last month, including “a worrying increase in fire safety violations.”

Bradley Gordon, an American lawyer based in Phnom Penh, said that Cambodia had strong laws on safety and other issues, drafted partly with help from international advisers, but that enforcement was often weak.

The cause of the ceiling collapse Thursday was not immediately known. Ken Loo, the secretary general of the Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia, said that steel beams holding up a concrete-floored storage area at mezzanine height between two buildings had given way.

One of the workers injured in the collapse, Jonh Sokpheak, 29, said the mezzanine was “overloaded” with materials for sneakers.

Mr. Sokpheak said he avoided more serious injury because when the ceiling collapsed he fell under a table.

“I feel like I’ve been reincarnated; I didn’t think I would survive,” he said from his hospital bed. “I crawled and crawled and then made it outside.”

Other workers described a frantic rush to safety.

“People were screaming, ‘Get out! Get out!’ ” said Thinna Makara, a 40-year-old woman who sews fabrics for sneakers.

Workers at the factory, called Wing Star Shoes, were making shoes for Asics, an athletic shoe company based in Kobe, Japan, said a company spokesman, Naomichi Hatori. He could not immediately say which market the shoes were shipped to, or whether the plant also made shoes for other brands.

Mr. Hatori said that Asics “offered its deepest sympathies” to the victims and their families and that the company would consider measures to revamp safety at its overseas suppliers.

Popular with runners, Asics has been particularly successful in the United States, where it emphasizes corporate responsibility.

The factory, which opened about 18 months ago and was built on top of former rice paddies, employs about 8,000 people, workers say.

Employees have been asked to report to work on Monday, according to Komean Keang, a seamstress who on Thursday night was attending the wake of one of the workers killed, Ream Sa Roeun.

Mr. Sa Roeun’s mother was inconsolable and had not eaten all day, family members said. She was given compensation of $5,000 by the company.

Entry-level workers at the factory are paid around $75 a month, Cambodia’s minimum wage.

“It’s not enough, especially when your children get sick,” Ms. Makara, the seamstress, said. Workers have gone on strike three times since September, she said, and each time factory managers agreed to a monthly raise of $5.

Ms. Makara’s sister, Melia, a forewoman at the factory, said seamstresses sew about 450 pairs of sneakers in a typical day, including overtime.

Melia Makara, 26, said she was not afraid to return to work because the collapse occurred in a part of the factory far from where she works. Thursday’s collapse was the first fatal accident she had witnessed in four years in the shoe industry, she said.

Until asked about it, Ms. Makara was not aware of the factory collapse in Bangladesh.

Some workers said they were eager to return to work.

“Rice farming cannot support my family,” Mr. Sokpheak said. “I want to go back to work at the factory.”

Thomas Fuller reported from Tream Tbal, Cambodia, and Keith Bradsher from Hong Kong. Poypiti Amatatham contributed reporting from Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Hiroko Tabuchi from Tokyo.

 

Categories: Uncategorized

A Real “Made in the USA” Retail Stock That Supports Your Portfolio, Not Sweatshops

By , Published May 16, 2013

A Real “Made in the USA” Retail Stock That Supports Your Portfolio, Not Sweatshops image 160513 PC leongThe recent devastation of the garment building collapse in Bangladesh was both horrific and a reminder that many of these sweatshop operations that make your clothing are not operating according to American standards. But the fact is that many of these operations in Bangladesh and other low-cost labor markets in Asia produce the clothes you buy; this is what allows prices to be cheap for American buyers and others. The low cost of production also allows companies to reap more earnings.Yet while the collapse of the factory building was a total shock, the underlying issues of major apparel makers using cheap labor in these poor countries have been going on for decades as a way of improving earnings.

In the pursuit of earnings growth, The Gap, Inc. (NYSE/GPS) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE/WMT) have long been accused of turning a blind eye to the extremely poor working conditions of the third-party factory workers who produce cheap goods for consumers here and abroad. The reason is the need to deliver earnings.

The reason why the conditions are largely ignored is simply a matter of cutting costs and increasing earnings. Consumers in the richer countries want cheaper clothing and goods. Companies want lower costs and higher earnings. The demand for low costs places immense pressure on the third-party manufacturers to run a very tight operation, which is why the incident in Bangladesh was allowed to happen and why similar incidents will continue to occur as long as earnings are key.

For those who want to support the local manufacturing sector, especially in the highly competitive apparel sector, there are still some U.S. companies that manufacture here.

A small-cap speculative retail play with high risk and above-average upside potential is Los Angeles, California-based American Apparel, Inc. (AMEX/APP), with a share price of $1.81. A big surprise is that the manufacturing for American Apparel is not done in China or another low-cost country; rather, the company makes its clothes out of an 800,000-square-foot facility in downtown Los Angeles. Other facilities are found in California.

A Real “Made in the USA” Retail Stock That Supports Your Portfolio, Not Sweatshops image American Apparel Inc Chart

Chart courtesy of http://www.StockCharts.com

The company is a vertically integrated manufacturer, distributor, and retailer of branded fashion apparel for women, men, children, and babies. Its products include T-shirts, denim, sweaters, jackets, and casual wear, along with related accessories and personal care products.

American Apparel is a global company with over 260 retail stores in 19 countries, including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and China. About 146 stores are situated in the U.S., with Canada at around 38 stores.

American Apparel reported 23 straight months of positive comparable store sales, according to the company web site. In April, comparable store sales jumped five percent, but the growth from the company’s online sales to over 60 countries surged 17%.

American Apparel is a high-risk buying opportunity that can return big profits if the company can deliver steady revenue and earnings growth.

The earnings side will come, but it’s more difficult, given the higher domestic labor costs.

The company reported sequential annual revenue growth from $201.5 million in 2006 to $558.8 million in 2010 to $547.3 million in 2011 and $617.3 million in 2012. The revenue growth is estimated to continue at 6.2% in 2013 and seven percent in 2014, according to data by Thomson Financial.

If you want to buy “Made in the USA” stocks while taking a stand against the terrible working conditions in global sweatshops, look to American Apparel

Categories: Uncategorized

 Omni-Channel the Buzzword Heard Round the Globe May

 Omni-Channel the Buzzword Heard Round the Globe

May 14, 2013
 OrderDynamics has posted a great roundup of the eTail Canada show,

“The third installment of eTail Canada offered the most accurate portrayal of eCommerce and omni-channel retailing in Canada that we’ve ever seen,” the OrderDynamics post stated. Here’s what else the company had to say:Blog - Lowes-Shopping Channel

Day One Highlights

The opening keynote panel, which featured Ted Starkman (former President of the Shopping Channel) and Tanbir Grover (Director of eCommerce at Lowe’s Canada), touched on an array of high-level omni-channel concepts including the idea that mobile sites and strategies are playing an important role in supporting in-store shopping experiences. Tanbir continued to suggest that as an online community we still need to figure out what the right mobile experience is, and that we need to spend the same amount of time and thought on mobile shopping sites and strategies as we’ve done in the past for desktop experiences.

The final theme of this panel session discussed Canada’s retail landscape and the incoming wave of U.S. retailers expanding north of the border. “Canada is seeing global competition for the first time,” said Starkman. He continued to explore how Canadian retailers will react to increased competition and aggressive expansion plans. He also noted that many of the U.S. retailers set to enter Canada (or currently entering Canada) already have strong awareness with Canadian consumers, citing Target and Nordstrom as notable examples.

Later that morning, OrderDynamics CEO, Michael Benadiba, led an executive roundtable discussing best practices being used by mid-large retailers to deploy omni-channel commerce initiatives. The roundtable featured great contribution and savvy advice from some of Canada’s biggest and most sophisticated retailers – both Canadian, as well as those based out of the U.S. As if it wasn’t already clear, the appetite and desire to deliver a best of breed, unified shopping experience is at an all-time high in Canada. While it makes perfect sense, it’s encouraging to see such a challenging undertaking taken so seriously by senior retail leaders. As we’ve noted in recent omni-channel focused webinars, executive buy-in is a critical when launching omni-channel commerce strategies.

Tara Conway (Director of eCommerce at Toys “R” Us Canada) spoke about Toys “R” Us and its ongoing cross-channel efforts to drive improved shopping experiences and deliver ultimate convenience for their customers. According to Tara, cross-channel customers for Toys ‘R Us are more loyal, and buy more than single channel customers (her stats suggested cross-channel customers buy three to four times more frequently, similar to results from Macy’s). Tara also suggested major challenges in launching (and maintaining) omni-channel strategies are ensuring e-commerce and IT departments are completely aligned, and that endless online aisle inventories can lead to frustrating in-store experiences when product assortment isn’t consistent from web to store – two points that can be overlooked when creating customer-centric strategies.

Day Two Highlights

eTail Canada’s second day started with a keynote presentation from OrderDynamics VP of Operations, Tammy Nyman. Tammy’s address focused on the evolution of Canadian consumers, their expectations, and what retailers are doing to meet these growing expectations. She also outlined the percentage of Canadian retailers operating eCommerce websites (statistics were collected from an independent study of 900+ retailers in Canada by OrderDynamcs in January 2013).

Following Tammy’s session, she continued to chair and moderate several speaking panels throughout the day including an insightful panel that featured Todd Dean (VP of Cross-Channel and eCommerce atALDO Group) and Thierry Hay-Sabourin (Director of eCommerce at Best Buy Canada/Futureshop). Like much of the conference, this session focused on omni-channel retailing, and how Canadian retailers are “flattening” their organizations to adapt to modern shopping expectations and reduce channel-centric approaches. Thierry had a great quote that truly depicts the challenge that lies within omni-channel commerce, saying,

“Multi-channel retailing means involving every area of your business and working together. It means massive disruption for organizations.”

Todd added to that too, saying,

“Omni-channel is a re-think of the retail model. It supports the consumer decision making journey. [Aldo] has no hesitation to change our online experience if it isn’t supporting our retail stores.”

The afternoon keynote presentation featured Peter Sheldon of Forrester Research. While the tone of Peter’s presentation was a bit more urgent than that of previous sessions, it was largely based on his views that e-commerce in Canada has so much potential. Peter talked at length about the need for Canadian retailers to offer more convenience and improved fulfillment options to customers, suggesting both Futureshop and Laura Canada as market leaders. Peter’s presentation offered revealing stats and trends about Canadian consumers and their shopping habits, including the fact that two-thirds of Canadians have purchased online goods from US retailers – a sign that Canadian consumers aren’t afraid to pay more (duties/shipping, exchange rate, etc.) for products they want and can’t find locally.

Categories: Uncategorized

6 Retailers Join Bangladesh Factory Pact

New York Times

Published: May 14, 2013
Six major retailers, including Carrefour, Marks & Spencer and El Corte Inglés, announced on Tuesday that they would participate in a landmark plan to improve fire and building safety in Bangladesh, joining five European companies that signed onto the plan on Monday.
Photo of a production order for jeans to be sold at Walmart that the Bangladesh Center for Worker Solidarity said it found in the rubble after the Rana Plaza building collapse in Bangladesh.

With only one American company joining — PVH, the parent company of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger — consumers, investors and labor groups are pressing Gap, Walmart and other American retailers and apparel companies to sign onto the effort. The plan will require participating companies to agree to rigorous inspection of the factories they use in Bangladesh and to help underwrite needed safety improvements at factories with violations.

Once numerous European companies began joining the plan on Monday — led by H&M, the Swedish company that is the largest purchaser of apparel from Bangladesh — a division has appeared between European and American companies about what needs to be done to respond to the April 24 factory building collapse in Bangladesh in which more than 1,100 workers died.

Walmart has maintained a distance from the collapse, even though Ether Tex, one of the factories in the collapsed Rana Plaza building, had listed Walmart as a customer on its Web site. Both Walmart and Ether Tex’s chairman have said that Walmart was not a customer at the time of the building collapse.

The Bangladesh Center for Worker Solidarity has provided The New York Times with photos of what it says are documents recovered in the Rana Plaza rubble that show that a Walmart contactor from Canada, Fame Jeans, was having jeans produced for Walmart at Ether Tex. One document, a purchase order dated May 12, 2012, calls for “dark blue wash,” “skinny fit” jeans to be delivered in the fall of 2012.

Another document, dated April 27, 2012, discusses pricing for five different jeans styles, with the F.O.B. prices ranging from $3.41 to $4.50 a pair.

Kevin Gardner, a Walmart spokesman, noted that the documents were from a year ago. “Our investigation of the Rana Plaza building site after the collapse revealed no evidence of authorized or unauthorized production at the time of the tragedy,” Mr. Gardner said. “If we learn of any unauthorized production, we will take appropriate action based upon our zero-tolerance policy on unauthorized subcontracting. We remain committed to promoting stronger safety measures in factories, and that work continues.”

Judy Gearhart, executive director of the International Labor Rights Forum, an advocacy group in Washington, said Walmart was improperly trying to distance itself from the building collapse.

“It’s another example of Walmart’s lack of ability to track the specifics of its supply chain,” she said. She called on Walmart to join a compensation fund for the victims of the Rana Plaza building collapse.

So far no American company has agreed to contribute to such a fund, while Loblaws of Canada, Primark of Britain, El Corte Inglés of Spain and three other European companies have agreed to participate.

Consumer and labor groups have focused more on persuading Gap rather than Walmart to join the Bangladesh factory safety plan. Gap has been the most vocal company in criticizing the plan, expressing concerns that overly litigious American lawyers could seize on the agreement to sue American companies on behalf of aggrieved factory workers in Bangladesh. Gap’s proposed changes would greatly limit any legal liability for any company that violated the plans.

In a statement, Gap said: “We’re pleased that an accord is within reach, and Gap Inc. is ready to sign on today with a modification to a single area — how disputes are resolved in the courts. This proposal is on the table right now with the parties involved. With this single change, this global, historic agreement can move forward with a group of all retailers, not just those based in Europe.”

Under Gap’s proposal, if a retailer is found to have violated the agreement, the only remedy would be public expulsion from the factory safety plan.

“The U.S. is quite litigious,” said Bill Chandler, a Gap spokesman. “We put forward specific proposals that we thought would bring other American retailers into the fold. We thought it would be a step forward and would turn it into a much more global agreement.”

The labor unions and advocacy groups that have negotiated with H&M; Inditex, the Spanish company that owns the Zara chain; and other companies that have signed the plan criticized Gap’s proposal to change the agreement. These groups say Gap’s vigorous push against the version of the plan has helped sway some other American companies not to sign.

“Gap Inc. is ready to sign on today with a modification to a single area — how disputes are resolved,” said Scott Nova, executive director of the Worker Rights Consortium, a group sponsored by 175 colleges and universities. “Gap’s demand is that the agreement be made unenforceable — and therefore meaningless. What Gap wants is the right to renege on its commitments when it wishes.”

Gap says that it has already taken substantial steps to improve safety at the 78 factories it says it uses in Bangladesh. It has hired a respected fire inspector to examine those factories and has pledged $22 million in loans to help finance safety upgrades when problems are found.

Among the other companies that joined the Bangladesh safety plan on Tuesday were Kik, a German low-cost apparel retailer; Aldi, the German retail chain; and G-Star Raw, a Dutch designer clothing company.

Categories: Uncategorized
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers

%d bloggers like this: